|
Article information
2021 , Volume 26, ¹ 1, p.33-49
Mikhalchenko E.V., Nikitin V.F., Stamov L.I., Phylippov Y.G.
Modelling of a rotating detonation engine combustion chamber
Purpose. To create software for studying the features of the transition from ignition and deflagration to a detonation mode in a three-dimensional configuration, including the formation and propagation of a rotating detonation complex, which takes transient processes into account. Methodology. The software is based on a mathematical model for multi-component gas dynamics with chemical reactions and turbulent transport for diffusion, viscosity, and thermal conductivity. High-order calculation schemes are used. To solve a stiff subsystem of kinetic equations, a hybrid implicit-explicit Novikov method is used (a specific variant of a Rosenbrock method). Findings. Authors created a code which calculates physical processes within a multi-component gas dynamics paradigm. The code accounts for chemical processes and turbulence modelling. The shape of computation domain and the type of boundary conditions is user defined. These include boundary conditions at the wall, as well as inflow and outflow conditions for both subsonic, and supersonic modes. Initial conditions can be set up differently in different regions of the domain. The software consists of several modules: a mesh-building module, initial state creation, calculation of new time layers saving the intermediate and final results at control points with a possibility to resume interrupted calculations, and post-processing modules. Authors developed blocks of solutions for various elementary chemical kinetic mechanisms, one of considered mechanisms is build up by themselves, others are published previously. It was obtained that the details of the 3D transient problem solution significantly depend on the chosen mechanism. Îriginality/value. The software complex makes it possible to process numerical modelling of a detonation engine combustion chamber in a 3D configuration considering chemical reactions and turbulent transport. Different chemical kinetics mechanisms are utilizable, and thrust characteristics could be obtained.
[full text]
Keywords: mathematical modelling, detonation,deflagration, engine with a rotating detonation wave, chemical kinetics
doi: 10.25743/ICT.2021.26.1.003
Author(s):
Mikhalchenko Elena Viktorovna
Position: Junior Research Scientist
Office: Federal Science Center Scientific Research Institute for System Analysis of Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: 117218, Russia, Moscow, 36-1, Nakhimovskiy pr.
Phone Office: (495) 7182110
E-mail: mikhalchenkolena@yandex.ru
SPIN-code: 7946-8835Nikitin Valeriy Fedorovich
PhD. , Associate Professor
Office: Lomonosov Moscow State University
Address: 119991, Russia, Moscow, Leninskie Gory,1
Phone Office: (495) 9393754
E-mail: vfnikster@gmail.com
Stamov Lyuben Ivanovich
Position: Junior Research Scientist
Office: Federal Science Center Scientific Research Institute for System Analysis of Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: 117218, Russia, Moscow, Leninskie Gory,1
Phone Office: (495) 7182110
E-mail: lyubenstamov@mail.ru
SPIN-code: 5351-1868Phylippov Yuriy Grigorevich
Dr. , Associate Professor
Office: Lomonosov Moscow State University
Address: 119991, Russia, Moscow, Leninskie Gory,1
Phone Office: (495) 9393754
E-mail: mech.math.msu@rambler.ru
References:
1. Wolanski P. Detonative propulsion. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute. 2013; (34):125–158.
2. Zeldovich Y.B. On the use of detonative combustion in power engineering. Journal of Technical Physics. 1940; (10):1453–1461.
3. Nicholls J.A., Wilkinson H.R., Morrison R.B. Intermittent detonation as a thrust producing mechanism. Journal of Jet Propulsion. 1957; 27(5):534–541.
4. Voitsekhovskii B.V. Steady detonation. Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR. 1959; 129(6):1254–1256.
5. Voitsekhovskii B.V., Mitrofanov V.V., Topchiyan M.E. Detonation-front structure in gases. Novosibirsk: Izdanie Sibirskogo Otdyelyeniya Akadyemii Nauk SSSR; 1963: 168.
6. Anand V., Gutmark E. Rotating detonation combustors and their similarities to rocket instabilities. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science. 2019; (73):182–234.
7. Bykovskii F.A., Zhdan S.A., Vedernikov E.F. Continuous spin detonation in annular combustors. Combustion, Explosion and Shock Waves. 2005; 41(4):449–459.
8. Kindracki J., Kobiera A., Wolanski P., Gut Z., Folusiak M., Swiderski K. Experimental and numerical study of the rotating detonation engine in hydrogen – air mixtures. Progress in Propulsion Physics. 2011; (2):555–582.
9. Frolov S.M., Dubrovskii A.V., Ivanov V.S. Three-dimensional numerical simulation of operation process in rotating detonation engine. Progress in Propulsion Physics. 2013; (4):467–488.
10. Zhenhua P., Baochun F., Xudong Z., Mingyue G., Gang D. Wavelet pattern and selfsustained mechanism of gaseous detonation rotating in a coaxial cylinder. Combustion and Flame. 2011; (158):2220–2228.
11. George A.St., Driscoll R., Anand V., Gutmark E. On the existence and multiplicity of rotating detonations. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute. 2017; (36):2691–2698.
12. Tang X., Wang J., Shao Y. Three-dimensional numerical investigations of the rotating detonation engine with a hollow combustor. Combustion and Flame. 2015; (162):997–1008.
13. Sun J., Zhou J., Liu S., Lin Z., Lin W. Numerical investigation of a non-premixed hollow rotating detonation engine. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2019; (44):17084–17094.
14. Bykovskii F.A., Mitrofanov V.V., Vedernikov E.F. Continuous detonation combustion of fuel – air mixtures. Combustion, Explosion and Shock Waves. 1997; (33):344–353.
15. Bykovskii F.A., Vedernikov E.F., Zholobov Y.A. Detonation combustion of lignite with titanium dioxide and water additives in air. Combustion, Explosion and Shock Waves. 2017; (53):453–460.
16. Nakagami S., Matsuoka K., Kasahara J., Kumazawa Y., Fujii J., Matsuo A. Experimental visualization of the structure of rotating detonation waves in a disk-shaped combustor. Journal of Propulsion and Power. 2016; (33):80–88.
17. Wen H., Xie Q., Wang B. Propagation behaviors of rotating detonation in an obround combustor. Combustion and Flame. 2019; (210):389–398.
18. Levin V.A., Manuylovich I.S., Markov V.V. Rotating detonation wave in an annular gap. Proceedings of the Steklov Institute of Mathematics. 2018; 300(1):126–136.
19. Nikitin F., Filippov Y., Stamov L., Mikhalchenko E. 3D problems of rotating detonation wave in a ramjet engine modeled on a supercomputer. Supercomputing Frontiers and Innovations. 2018; 5(2):76–85.
20. Wilcox D.C. Turbulence modeling for CFD. California: DCW Industries, Inc. La Canada; 1994: 460.
21. Liou M.-S. A sequel to AUSM: AUSM+. Journal of Computational Physics. 1996; (129):364–382.
22. van Leer B. Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme V. A second-order sequel to Godunov’s method. Journal of Computational Physics. 1979; 32(1):101–136. DOI:10.1016/0021-9991(79)90145-1.
23. Launder B.E., Spalding D.B. The numerical computation of turbulent flows. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering. 1974; (3):269–289.
24. Kader B.A. Temperature and concentration profiles in fully turbulent boundary layers. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 1981; (24):1541–1544.
25. Bredberg J. On the wall boundary condition for turbulence models. Internal Report 00/4. Goteborg, Sweden: Department of Thermo and Fluid Dynamics Chalmers University of Technology; 2000: 25. Available at: http://www.tfd.chalmers.se/\sim{}lada/postscript_files/jonas_report_WF.pdf (Accessed 06.12.2020).
26. Popovac M., Hanjalic K. Compound wall treatment for RANS computation of complex turbulent flows and heat transfer. Flow Turbulence Combustion. 2007; (78):177–202.
27. Maas U., Pope S.B. Simplifying chemical kinetics: Intrinsic low-dimensional manifolds in composition space. Combustion and Flame. 1992; (88):239–264.
28. Hong Z., Cook R.D., Davidson D.F., Hanson R.K. A shock tube study of OH+H2O2→ H2O+HO2 and H2O2+M→2OH+M using laser absorption of H2O and OH: Intrinsic low-dimensional manifolds in composition space. Journal of Physical Chemistry A. 2010; 114(18):5718–5727. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp100204z
29. Williams F.A. Short chemical mechanisms for deflagrations and detonations. Proceedings of the Western States Section Combustion Institute Spring Meeting, 29–30 March, 2004. Davis: University of California; 2004: 04S-1.
30. GRI-Mech version 3.0 7/30/99. CHEMKIN-II format. Available at: http://combustion.berkeley. edu/gri-mech (Accessed 06.12.2020).
31. Li J., Zhao Z.W., Kazakov À., Dryer F.L. An updative comprehensive kinetic model of hydrogen combustion. International Journal of Chemical Kinetics. 2004; (36):566–575.
32. Smirnov N.N., Nikitin V.F., Stamov L.I., Mikhalchenko E.V., Tyurenkova V.V. Threedimensional modleling of rotating detonation in a ramjet engine. Acta Astronautica. 2019; 163(Part A):168–176. DOI:10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.02.016.
33. Novikov E.A. A study of (𝑚, 2)-methods for stiff systems. Computational Technologies. 2007; 12(5):103–115. (In Russ.)
34. Smirnov N.N., Penyazkov O.G., Sevrouk K.L., Nikitin V.F., Stamov L.I., Tyurenkova V.V. Onset of detonation in hydrogen – air mixtures due to shock wave reflection inside a combustion chamber. Acta Astronautica. 2018; (149):77–92.
35. Stamov L. Numerical simulation of shock waves reflection and focusing inside a wedge in chemically reacting gas mixture. Proceeding in Cybernetics. 2018; (4):85–94. (In Russ.)
36. Martynenko V.V., Penyazkov O.G., Ragotner K.A., Shabunya S.I. High-temperature ignition of hydrogen and air at high pressures downstream of the reflected shock wave. Journal of Engineering Physics and Thermophysics. 2004; 77(4):785–793.
37. Penyazkov O.G., Ragotner K.A., Dean A.J., Varatharajan B. Autoignition of propane – air mixtures behind reflected shock waves. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute. 2005; 30(2):1941–1947.
Bibliography link:
Mikhalchenko E.V., Nikitin V.F., Stamov L.I., Phylippov Y.G. Modelling of a rotating detonation engine combustion chamber // Computational technologies. 2021. V. 26. ¹ 1. P. 33-49
|
